Members of the Council of Canadians - Winnipeg Chapter contributed to the Manitoba Energy Justice Coalition’s (MEJC) new report, “The Energy East Pipeline: Avenues for Government Action Outside the Broken NEB Process." The report offers ways the provincial and municipal governments can protect Manitobans from the Energy East pipeline and discusses decisions made by other provinces and municipalities in the context of Manitoba's unique concerns.
"During this provincial election, the parties must recognize that the threat of the Energy East pipeline can't be ignored. Voters need to know where the parties stand," said Mary Robinson, chair of the Council of Canadians – Winnipeg Chapter and the author of the report. "Manitobans deserve to know exactly what risks would result from the conversion of a natural gas line to a dilbit line running so close to the Winnipeg aqueduct."
“The major risk this project poses to the water supply is the virtual certainty of at some time the 40-year pipeline will have small, undetected leaks that let soluble, cancer causing chemicals like benzene leech into the submerged aqueduct,” said Dennis LeNeveu, a retired biophysicist who was part of a research team studying the Canadian concept for nuclear fuel waste disposal for Atomic Energy Canada, and is also a member of the Council of Canadians – Winnipeg Chapter. “Transcanada’s own documents show us the pipeline is already leaking and their detection equipment can’t pick up small continuous leaks.”
“You couldn’t put the pipeline in a worse place for the safety of the aqueduct,” says Doug Tingey, a lawyer and member of Council of Canadians – Winnipeg Chapter. “Where the groundwater drains north, the pipeline is south of the aqueduct; where the groundwater drains south, the pipeline is to the north.”
Council of Canadians Winnipeg Chapter - No Energy East BLOG Series
Council of Canadians - Energy East pipeline may put at risk Winnipeg's drinking water
The Dominion - A Threat to Winnipeg’s Water Supply?
SIGN AND SHARE THE PETITION
STANDING WITH INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES
Shoal Lake 40 First Nation - Beyond Freedom Road
Winnipeg's decision to build an aqueduct from Shoal Lake had serious repercussions for the people of the Shoal Lake 40 First Nations community. They were dispossessed of land that included ancestral burial grounds as well as their village at the mouth of the Falcon River. Forced to move to the adjacent peninsula, they were completely cut off when that peninsula was subsequently severed from the mainland by a canal diverting coloured Falcon River water away from Winnipeg's intake. The community has struggled with its man-made isolation ever since.
The First Leg of Freedom Road from Shoal Lake 40 First Nation
The Council of Canadians is committed to an ongoing relationship with Shoal Lake 40. We support them in their reasonable demand for an end to the century-long isolation imposed by the City of Winnipeg's water infrastructure. Many lives have been lost and damaged by this man-made isolation, while Winnipeg has benefited and profited from the water.
In December 2015 the three levels of government finally announced the $30 million in funding to build Freedom Road, which will end more than 100 years of forced isolation. It’s good news and a positive step forward! The community has a right to clean drinking water and opportunity for its people. We would encourage those of us on the receiving end of Shoal Lake's water, including all levels of governments, to continue to work with Shoal Lake 40 for justice.
Shoal Lake 40 website
Lake St. Martin First Nation - Flooded and Displaced
In 2011 the Manitoba government diverted flood water bound for Winnipeg to the north and as a result, most of the Lake St. Martin First Nation (LSMFN), a reserve for 140 years and home to Anishinaabe people, was washed out. Since then the 1,064 LSMFN members reside in urban hotels and other temporary residences.
“The impacts from flooding and dislocation on LSMFN are profound and extensive. Environmental and developmental displacement has resulted in community members describing themselves as refugees in their homeland. Participants reported that health impacts in their community include premature deaths, increased rates of suicides, miscarriages, mental health issues, and worsening of chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The impact on community members is also expected to be more profoundly negative and long lasting than those subjected to other community relocations because of their deep attachment to their land and loss of subsistence and resource livelihoods.” Lake St. Martin First Nation Community Members’ Experiences of Induced Displacement: “We’re like refugees” Refuge - Number 2, Volume 29
Relocation plans looked like they were heading forward, but the project has been marred by problems. The construction of a new community began in the spring of 2015 on the Halaburda land adjacent to the flooded reserve. But this property is also supersaturated, similar to the original reserve. Several feet of scrub and peat moss has to be dug out and foundations must be constructed, as well as a huge drainage system that must be run year-round. Now, Chief Adrian Sinclair is asking the federal government to investigate whether “inappropriate” behaviour on the part of Indigenous Affairs officials has deprived his people of a suitable community.
WATCH FULL DOCUMENTARY:
Flooding Hope: The Lake St. Martin First Nation Story
Treading Water: Plight of the 2011 Manitoba First Nation Flood Evacuees
Pimicikamak - The Agreement to Process signedWe stand with the people of Pimicikamak in their ongoing process with the Provincial Government and Manitoba Hydro.
Nearly 5,000 people live in the area, which is located over 700 kilometers north of Winnipeg. Local residents there say they have some of the highest electricity and heating bills in the province, despite the electricity generated from a dam in their own territory. The issue is much larger than just utility bills though. There are issues of treaty rights to land and a Northern Flood Agreement (NFA), which is not being implemented. The NFA is supposed to compensate northern Manitoba First Nations affected by hydro development.
Green Green Water 84:34
Grassy Narrows - From Mercury Poisoning to Mass Deforestation
Asubpeeschoseewagong First Nation (also known as Grassy Narrows First Nation) is an Anishinaabeg community located 80 km north of Kenora, Ontario.
In the 1960's the Dryden Chemical Company poisoned the English-Wabigoon River System with mercury from their effluent discharge. People from Grassy Narrows continue to suffer the effects of mercury poisoning more than 40 years after their commercial fishery was closed.
In 1985 the First Nation received a settlement agreement, which, by today's standards is inadequate. As well, the mercury has never been removed from the water and it continues to adversely affect the health of Grassy Narrows residents today.
Weyerhauser Forest Products has been harvesting trees in the area to supply its Timberstrand Mill in Kenora. The community is concerned about the mass extraction of trees for paper and fears that deforestation will irreversibly damage local habitat.
SUPPORT FRACKING MORATORIUM
Most of Manitoba’s over 3,600 active oil wells have been fracked. The fracking that is taking place in Manitoba hasn't yet caused the infamous flaming water taps that have been seen in the US and Alberta. Natural gas released by fracking is very mobile and has been correlated with methane contamination of well water from fracking of the Marcellus shales in the US that are deeper than the exploited shales here. Contamination of groundwater from fracking has not yet been observed in Manitoba, but the water is pushed underground together with sand and chemicals, to fracture the earth and release oil and gas. The oil and gas is pumped out, and the permanently poisoned water is left there, deep within the fractured earth. It won’t stay contained and separate from groundwater forever.
Fracking in Manitoba
SIGN AND SHARE THE PETITION